VOICE OF NAIJA – The controversy surrounding the alleged plan to reintegrate “repentant terrorists” has struck far deeper than a routine policy debate.
The criticism by the African Democratic Congress (ADC) directed at the administration of Bola Ahmed Tinubu is rooted in a painful national reality, years of bloodshed that have left thousands of Nigerian families grieving, displaced, and searching for justice.
Across the North-East and other affected regions, the scars of terrorism remain fresh.
Villages have been razed in midnight attacks, worshippers killed in sacred spaces, children orphaned, and entire communities uprooted.
For families who lost loved ones, the idea that those responsible, or even those linked to such violence, could be returned to society without visible accountability is not just unsettling; it is deeply distressing.
It forces a difficult question: what does justice mean when victims are still counting their losses?
READ ALSO: Atiku’s Son Rejects Fintiri’s APC Defection
Public sentiment reflects this unease. Many Nigerians already feel vulnerable in the face of persistent insecurity, and any policy perceived as lenient toward perpetrators risks deepening that fear.
There is widespread concern that reintegrated individuals could pose fresh dangers, whether by reconnecting with extremist networks, leaking sensitive information, or exploiting weaknesses in monitoring systems.
Trust, once shattered by violence, cannot be easily rebuilt through assurances alone.
Beyond security lies the human cost. The psychological burden is immense.
Imagine a grieving parent or widow encountering, in everyday life, someone associated with the violence that destroyed their family.
Communities are being asked, in effect, to reconcile without first seeing justice done. Yet reconciliation cannot be forced; it must be earned through truth, accountability, and respect for victims.
At the same time, it is important to acknowledge that rehabilitation, in principle, is not without merit.
Globally, deradicalisation programmes have been used as part of broader strategies to break cycles of violence.
However, such efforts only succeed when grounded in strict accountability, rigorous screening, and sustained monitoring.
Without these safeguards, reintegration risks becoming a dangerous loophole rather than a pathway to peace.
This is where the ADC’s concerns resonate strongly. Nigerians have not been given clear answers: Who qualifies as “repentant”? What investigations or prosecutions have taken place? What systems exist to monitor these individuals after reintegration? And have affected communities been consulted?
The absence of transparency only fuels suspicion and erodes confidence.
There is also a moral line that must not be crossed. Justice is not optional in a lawful society, it is essential.
Victims deserve closure, and that cannot come from policies that appear to prioritise perpetrators over accountability.
READ ALSO: APC Blasts Mark, Aregbesola Over Alleged ADC Hijack
Reintegration without justice is not reconciliation; it risks becoming injustice in another form.
Yet, a purely punitive approach may also fall short. A strategy with no pathway for disengagement could prolong conflict by leaving no exit for those willing to abandon violence.
The real challenge, therefore, lies in balance: ensuring that justice remains non-negotiable while any rehabilitation effort is carefully controlled, transparent, and rooted in the rule of law.
The federal government must urgently provide clarity. National security cannot be managed through ambiguity or silence.
If reintegration is part of the strategy, Nigerians deserve to see its full framework, its legal basis, safeguards, and accountability mechanisms.
Ultimately, a nation cannot heal by ignoring the pain of its people. Security is not just about policy, it is about trust, and without justice, there can be no trust.
For many Nigerians, the demand is clear: justice first, transparency always, and security above all.